If you cannot see the html version of this email then you can view it online at: http://www.planet-science.com/wired/wiredNL/index.html
wired-up heading

Friday 23rd June 2006 Issue: 50

Thank Wired-Up it’s Friday!

This week we are looking at sneaky science.  Fingerprinting, forensics and fiendishly-identifiable fluids.  So whodunnit? Who stitched up Pluto? It seems that its planet-ishness has been called into question. How very dare you!  Read on and see what you think.

  1. The Wire – How round is your planet?
  2. You What?  – SmartWater, the latest security device
  3. Planet Picks – how to become a forensic scientist
  4. Try This! – Sticky fingers
  5. Gear for Grabs – Fingerprint Detective Tube
1. The Wire  – Science news straight to your Inbox…

When is a planet not a planet?  That is the question.  At least according to the International Astronomical Union (IAU).  For the first time, the organisation will be officially defining the word "planet", and it is causing much debate in the world of astronomy. There is only one thing that everyone seems to agree on: there are no longer nine planets in the Solar System.

The whole debate was sparked off by the discovery in January of last year of a potential 10th planet, temporarily named 2003 UB313, which is bigger than Pluto.

Pluto is already an unusual planet. It is made predominantly of ice, and is smaller even than the Earth's Moon.

In 1992, scientists at the University of Hawaii discovered a new collection of objects beyond Neptune called the Kuiper Belt. Some suggest Pluto should no longer be considered a planet, but a Kuiper Belt Object. One researcher has come up with a clear planetary definition he would like to see the IAU adopt. In a nutshell – is it round?

This definition could lead to a Solar System with as many as 20 planets, including Pluto, 2003 UB313, and many objects previously classified as moons or asteroids.

New categories of planet could be introduced. Mercury, Venus, the Earth and Mars would be "rocky planets". The gas-giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune would be a second category. Pluto, 2003 UB313, and any other objects passing the "roundness test", would be reclassified as a third type of planet - perhaps "icy dwarfs". Whatever the final outcome, by September there will no longer be nine planets in the Solar System.  What?  What about My Very Easy Method Just Shows Us Nine Planets?  How are we supposed to write a rhyme to remember twenty or so planets?  There’s no respect…

For more information check out the BBC News website

Pluto - NASA

<< back to top

2. You What? - Science facts that might make you go “Hmm?”

Have you heard of SmartWater?  No it’s not some fancy new sports drink, it’s a security method. It acts a bit like a security marker.  You know when you write your postcode on your belongings and it can only be read under ultraviolet light?

SmartWater is a liquid containing uniquely numbered micro-dot particles. The smallest amount is sufficient for identification under a microscope. There are millions of combinations, each uniquely coded and licensed to an individual. A bit like DNA. Codes are held on a secure database.

Its unique forensic fingerprint is almost invisible to the naked eye. It fluoresces under ultraviolet light, and is virtually impossible to completely remove. Particles will remain on clothing indefinitely and can stay on the skin for weeks.  Criminals coming into contact with SmartWater can instantly be connected to the crime. Amazing eh?  Forensic science just gets better and better.

<< back to top

3. Planet Picks– News from the world of Planet Science…

If you are interested in forensic science and you’d like to know more about it as a career then take a look at a day in the life... Imtiaz Ahmad.

Plus try S.P.Y.S.C.I. a dossier on how to conduct undercover activities such as creating codes, using invisible ink, seeing round corners and detecting when someone’s lying …

<< back to top

4. Try This! – Science experiments for you to try at home...

Fingerprints – whodunnit?

You will need:

  • Fingers + friends' fingers
  • An assortment of drinking glasses - make sure they're clean!
  • Cocoa powder
  • A small artists' brush
  • A magnifying glass
  • An inkpad
  • White paper - one sheet per person

What to do:

  1. Give everybody a glass and a sheet of paper.
  2. Get each person to make a finger or thumb mark on the rim of the glass.
  3. Once they've done this, the detective work starts. Swap glasses, being careful to touch only the base of the glass. Don't smudge the prints that are already there!
  4. Examine each glass for fingerprints. Using the brush, place a small amount of cocoa over where the prints were made.
  5. Use the brush to lightly dust over the prints to help make them a bit clearer.
  6. On sheets of paper, get each person who left a print originally to make another print - but this time they have to press their finger or thumb in the inkpad first.
  7. Match these new prints to the ones you duster for earlier. Use the magnifying glass to help you inspect them even more closely and try to match them up.
  8. See if you can name the 'culprit' who left their prints on each glass. When you've had enough, wash and dry the glasses, and start again!

What’s happening:

No two fingerprints are the same; even twins will have differences in their prints.

When you examine a print you'll notice the lines occur in one of three characteristic patterns, known in the biz as 'arches', 'loops' and 'whorls'.

When you come to compare the chocolate and the ink prints you should get an exact match between pairs. But although two different people may have the same fingerprint type (e.g. both have loops on the same finger), there will always be other little differences between individuals. That's because it's not the shape of the print that's unique, but rather the number, location and shape of specific ridge characteristics...

What you were lifting with the cocoa powder are called 'latent' prints. These prints are formed by oil and sweat from a person's fingers when they touch a surface - the sweatier you are the clearer they'll be! They're invisible to the naked eye, which is why they need the dusting to help you see them...

Another method of taking your prints is to scribble on a piece of paper with a pencil then rub your finger over the scribble.  You should now have a nice grey fingertip! Now carefully take a piece of sticky tape and press the sticky side over your fingertip.  As you slowly peel it off you will see a very clear fingerprint stuck to it.  Stick this fingerprint down onto a white piece of paper. The features are very obvious, aren’t they?

If this has made you want to try more then look at the Creative Chemistry site.

There’s also a printable worksheet suitable for younger scientists in Dynamo's Lab on the BBC Education website.

Happy printing!

<< back to top

5. Gear for Grabs – You’ve got to be in it to win it...

How do you fancy winning a Fingerprint Detective Discovery Tube?  A nifty little kit in its own plastic tube.  Very handy for sleuthing…

So if you’d like it then email us your name, age and address to: wired-up.news@nesta.org.uk with ‘SUPERSLEUTH’ as the subject. The winner will be picked at random at 5pm, on Thursday 5 July.

Good luck!

<< back to top

THAT’S ALL FOR NOW

Got Wired-Up? Got clued up!

Don’t forget that Wired-Up will be hitting your inboxes every fortnight from now on, but in the meantime, send any questions, comments, jokes or experiment ideas to: wired-up.news@nesta.org.uk

If you would like to see any past Wired newsletters check out the archive page.

Until then, why not pay the Planet Science website a visit, by clicking here:
http://www.planet-science.com

P.S. If you wish to unsubscribe from Wired-Up then reply to this email with UNSUBSCRIBE as the subject.